Equal pay: Samira Ahmed faces BBC in an employment tribunal
BBC Presenter Samira Ahmed has taken the public service broadcaster to an employment tribunal, arguing she was being paid one-sixth of what Jeremy Vine was being paid for a similar role.
It is understood that the BBC is now facing more than a dozen other legal cases from female members of staff who believe that they were illegally paid less than their male colleagues.
Ahmed believes that she has been underpaid by hundreds of thousands of pounds since she began hosting the BBC Newswatch programme in 2012.
Ahmed states that she was paid £440 per episode for Newswatch, while Jeremy Vine was paid £3,000 per episode to present Points of View, a similar audience feedback programme.
The BBC’s legal team are arguing that the two presenters were not doing similar work, while Vine’s fee was reduced to £1,300 in January 2018, according to the National Union of Journalists (NUJ).
Equal pay is a different concept to the gender pay gap, as cases that are brought under equal pay legislation are based on specific claims that an employee was paid less than a colleague for doing the same, or comparable, work.
The BBC already accepted that Samira Ahmed was underpaid by up to 50 per cent in comparison with male colleagues for work she undertook on Radio 3 and Radio 4, promising to make up the difference.
Prior to the tribunal, Ahmed said: “I have a sense of pride working for a public service broadcaster which seeks to represent the diversity of Britain and its licence-fee payers. On the back of my BBC ID card are written the BBC values, which include ‘we respect each other and celebrate our diversity’ and ‘we take pride in delivering quality and value for money.
“I just ask why the BBC thinks I am worth only a sixth of the value of the work of a man for doing a very similar job.”
Latest posts by Amanda Hyam (see all)
- Government issues new guidance on furlough and annual leave - May 20, 2020
- Government expands Access to Work scheme to help disabled employees work from home - May 12, 2020
- COVID-19: The key employment law updates - May 5, 2020